{"id":999,"date":"2018-04-23T17:00:33","date_gmt":"2018-04-23T15:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arctrain.de\/?p=999"},"modified":"2018-11-08T10:57:47","modified_gmt":"2018-11-08T09:57:47","slug":"march-for-science-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arctrain.de\/ru\/march-for-science-why\/","title":{"rendered":"March for Science – Why?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\u201cWait a minute, wasn\u2019t it last year?\u201d<\/em> -asked many, who were surprised to hear, that March for Science – \u00a0the event which is supposed to bring attention to science in general and especially to earth sciences – is not a one-time thing.<\/p>\n<\/a>Yes, last year it took place for the first time. If you remember, it appeared as the reaction to the agenda of the Trump Administration. There are no alternative facts, there are only scientific-proved evidences, especially about climate change \u2013 this was the main message of March for Science organizers. Financial cuts in NASA climate department, quitting the Paris agreement and many more arrangements of that sort were not well accepted by American scientists, and their protests were supported throughout the world. Just recently New York Times<\/em> reported about Jim Birdenstine, who \u201chas no scientific qualifications to run NASA\u201d, and who is believed to be a climate change denier, to be confirmed on the post of NASA administrator. This shows once again that, until necessary changes are happening, scientists should step up.<\/p>\n